There are countless examples that illustrate why the staff and dozens of lawyer-volunteers at Lawyers for Lawyers do what they do. Director Sophie de Graaf often starts her presentations with a quote from Filipino lawyer Connie Brizuela: “If they can kill lawyers, they can kill anyone.” Brizuela meant that lawyers are often the last hope for people whose rights have been violated.
Her words proved prophetic. In 2009, Brizuela was murdered in what quickly became known as the Maguindanao massacre. Fifty-eight people were killed because the mayor of Ampatuan refused to accept the idea of free elections. Journalists, family members, bystanders, and lawyers were murdered. Indeed, they can kill anyone. It took ten more years before the perpetrators were convicted.
An extreme example? De Graaf knows many more. “In recent years, about 65 lawyers have been murdered in the Philippines due to their work.” And the Philippines is far from the only country where lawyers are targeted because of their profession. Last year, Lawyers for Lawyers supported 198 lawyers in 38 countries. According to De Graaf, that figure is just the tip of the iceberg.
This article is a republication and originally appeared in the professional journal Advocatie.
Threats and physical violence
De Graaf outlines the main problems lawyers face. First and foremost is interference with professional responsibilities. “Think of lawyers being denied access to their clients or the confidentiality of communication between lawyers and clients being compromised. Offices and homes are searched, and lawyers are denied access to information.”
Lawyers around the world are increasingly subjected to threats and physical violence. In addition, lawyers are criminally prosecuted or disbarred. “The internet has grown rapidly in many of the countries where we operate. Many lawyers use the internet and social media to expose abuses. This falls under their right to free expression, but they are often subjected to criminal prosecution as a result.”
Lawyers play a crucial role in upholding the rule of law, which is recognized internationally, including in the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. However, these principles are not widely known or respected. “In Tanzania, we interviewed many lawyers who could access their clients in detention but were not allowed to speak confidentially. A prison guard would stand in the room, taking notes. Many of these lawyers were unaware that international rules grant them the right to confidential communication with their clients. We highlighted this issue in our report to the United Nations.”
Defend, Empower, Influence
The mission of Lawyers for Lawyers is based on three pillars: Defend, Empower, Influence. Through these programs, Lawyers for Lawyers pursues three goals: “We want to stop the problems that lawyers face, strengthen protection measures or laws for lawyers in various countries, and foster solidarity by connecting Dutch lawyers with colleagues abroad. We also aim to connect lawyers globally, allowing them to share experiences, exchange knowledge, and discuss how to handle threats.”
Lawyers for Lawyers operates on a needs-based approach. All actions under the three pillars are initiated at the request of the lawyers themselves and only carried out with their full consent. In recent years, empowerment-focused training sessions have been conducted for lawyers in Uganda, Indonesia, Egypt, Kyrgyzstan, and Russia. “In 2019, we organized training in Russia at the request of a group of Russian lawyers. At the time, Russia was threatening to leave the Council of Europe. Russian lawyers frequently litigated before the European Court of Human Rights. They wanted more information about other international human rights mechanisms, such as those within the United Nations (UN). Together with four lawyers from Kennedy van der Laan, we conducted a three-day training session.”
Special UN status
This UN-related knowledge ties into the Influence pillar. Lawyers for Lawyers holds special consultative status at the UN, granting the organization the right to speak before the Human Rights Council and committees. De Graaf explains: “We make extensive use of this. I would estimate that 50% of our work involves research – both desk research and interviews with lawyers – writing reports, and lobbying at the UN and other human rights institutions.”
Defend remains the most tangible pillar. Sometimes, help is direct, such as attending the trial of a fellow lawyer being prosecuted for their work. Other times, it is more remote – for example, by sending mass postcards to a lawyer already imprisoned. These actions may seem small, but they highlight the impact of Lawyers for Lawyers. A striking example is Buzurgmehr Yorov, a lawyer from Tajikistan serving a prison sentence of over twenty years for representing leaders of an Islamic party. During the annual postcard campaign, Yorov received dozens of cards from fellow Dutch lawyers. De Graaf shares:
“He later reported that his treatment in prison improved. He was allowed more time with his family. Such a small gesture – sending a postcard – can make a real difference.”
Boels Zanders
Despite being a small organization with just five staff members, Lawyers for Lawyers enjoys the support of sixteen partner law firms and numerous individual lawyers. One of these partners is Boels Zanders, the first firm outside the Randstad region to join the initiative. Manager Fleur Kapiteijn explains how the firm became involved: “Boels Zanders invests heavily in charitable causes, but sometimes you miss the direct commitment to make a difference yourself. The work of Lawyers for Lawyers resonates deeply with our staff. People here are passionate about their profession, and this connects them with colleagues elsewhere – whether a lawyer in Cameroon or one of our own. That intrinsic motivation drives us to get involved.”
Financial contributions are important, but awareness and engagement are equally vital. Kapiteijn adds: “We stay in close contact with Sophie. If help is needed, we inform our firm, and individual lawyers can commit to supporting the cause. This doesn’t mean the answer is always yes – it has to fit within their workload – but we always explore the possibilities.”